Intel HD Graphics 610 vs Intel HD Graphics 505
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 610 and Intel HD Graphics 505 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 610
- Videocard is newer: launch date 0 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 300 MHz vs 250 MHz
- Around 38% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 83% higher texture fill rate: 26.4 GTexel / s vs 14.4 GTexel / s
- Around 83% better floating-point performance: 422.4 gflops vs 230.4 gflops
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 10 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 92% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 693 vs 361
- Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 155 vs 94
- Around 89% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2443 vs 1292
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1017 vs 470
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1017 vs 470
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 30 August 2016 vs 1 September 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz vs 250 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 800 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 26.4 GTexel / s vs 14.4 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 422.4 gflops vs 230.4 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt vs 10 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 8 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 693 vs 361 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 155 vs 94 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2443 vs 1292 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1017 vs 470 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1017 vs 470 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 505
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 18 vs 12
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 956 vs 464
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1635 vs 845
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 956 vs 464
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1635 vs 845
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 18 vs 12 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 956 vs 464 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1635 vs 845 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 956 vs 464 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1635 vs 845 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 610
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 505
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 610 | Intel HD Graphics 505 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 693 | 361 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 155 | 94 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2443 | 1292 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1017 | 470 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 464 | 956 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 845 | 1635 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1017 | 470 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 464 | 956 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 845 | 1635 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics 610 | Intel HD Graphics 505 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Generation 9.0 |
| Code name | Kaby Lake GT1 | Apollo Lake GT1 |
| Launch date | 30 August 2016 | 1 September 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 1531 | 1532 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 250 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 422.4 gflops | 230.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 12 | 18 |
| Texture fill rate | 26.4 GTexel / s | 14.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 189 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 |
| Shared memory | 1 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||

