Intel HD Graphics 610 vs Intel HD Graphics 505

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 610 and Intel HD Graphics 505 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 610

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 0 year(s) 11 month(s) later
  • Around 20% higher core clock speed: 300 MHz vs 250 MHz
  • Around 38% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 800 MHz
  • Around 83% higher texture fill rate: 26.4 GTexel / s vs 14.4 GTexel / s
  • Around 83% better floating-point performance: 422.4 gflops vs 230.4 gflops
  • 2x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 10 Watt
  • 4x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 8 GB
  • Around 89% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 687 vs 363
  • Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 155 vs 95
  • Around 83% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2443 vs 1333
  • 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1017 vs 470
  • 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1017 vs 470
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 30 August 2016 vs 1 September 2015
Core clock speed 300 MHz vs 250 MHz
Boost clock speed 1100 MHz vs 800 MHz
Texture fill rate 26.4 GTexel / s vs 14.4 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance 422.4 gflops vs 230.4 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 5 Watt vs 10 Watt
Maximum memory size 32 GB vs 8 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 687 vs 363
PassMark - G2D Mark 155 vs 95
Geekbench - OpenCL 2443 vs 1333
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1017 vs 470
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1017 vs 470

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 505

  • Around 50% higher pipelines: 18 vs 12
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 956 vs 464
  • Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1635 vs 845
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 956 vs 464
  • Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1635 vs 845
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 18 vs 12
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 956 vs 464
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1635 vs 845
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 956 vs 464
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1635 vs 845

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 610
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 505

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
687
363
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
155
95
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
2443
1333
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1017
470
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
464
956
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
845
1635
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1017
470
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
464
956
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
845
1635
Name Intel HD Graphics 610 Intel HD Graphics 505
PassMark - G3D Mark 687 363
PassMark - G2D Mark 155 95
Geekbench - OpenCL 2443 1333
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1017 470
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 464 956
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 845 1635
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1017 470
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 464 956
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 845 1635
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel HD Graphics 610 Intel HD Graphics 505

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.5 Generation 9.0
Code name Kaby Lake GT1 Apollo Lake GT1
Launch date 30 August 2016 1 September 2015
Place in performance rating 1523 1524
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1100 MHz 800 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 250 MHz
Floating-point performance 422.4 gflops 230.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 14 nm
Pipelines 12 18
Texture fill rate 26.4 GTexel / s 14.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 5 Watt 10 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 189 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 3.0 x1

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL 4.5 4.5

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 8 GB
Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit 64 / 128 Bit
Memory type DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4
Shared memory 1 1

Technologies

Quick Sync