Intel HD Graphics 610 vs Intel HD Graphics 505
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 610 and Intel HD Graphics 505 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 610
- Videocard is newer: launch date 0 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 300 MHz vs 250 MHz
- Around 38% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 83% higher texture fill rate: 26.4 GTexel / s vs 14.4 GTexel / s
- Around 83% better floating-point performance: 422.4 gflops vs 230.4 gflops
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 10 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 89% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 687 vs 363
- Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 155 vs 95
- Around 83% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2443 vs 1333
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1017 vs 470
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1017 vs 470
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 August 2016 vs 1 September 2015 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz vs 250 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 26.4 GTexel / s vs 14.4 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 422.4 gflops vs 230.4 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt vs 10 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 687 vs 363 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 155 vs 95 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2443 vs 1333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1017 vs 470 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1017 vs 470 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 505
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 18 vs 12
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 956 vs 464
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1635 vs 845
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 956 vs 464
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1635 vs 845
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 18 vs 12 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 956 vs 464 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1635 vs 845 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 956 vs 464 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1635 vs 845 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 610
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 505
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 610 | Intel HD Graphics 505 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 687 | 363 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 155 | 95 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2443 | 1333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1017 | 470 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 464 | 956 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 845 | 1635 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1017 | 470 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 464 | 956 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 845 | 1635 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Intel HD Graphics 505 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Generation 9.0 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT1 | Apollo Lake GT1 |
Launch date | 30 August 2016 | 1 September 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 1523 | 1524 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 800 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 250 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 422.4 gflops | 230.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 12 | 18 |
Texture fill rate | 26.4 GTexel / s | 14.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt | 10 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 189 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 |
Shared memory | 1 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |