Intel HD Graphics 505 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 505 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 505

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • Around 13% higher texture fill rate: 14.4 GTexel / s vs 12.72 GTexel / s
  • Around 81% better floating-point performance: 230.4 gflops vs 127.2 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
  • 6.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 65 Watt
  • 16x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 512 MB
  • 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 95 vs 38
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 September 2015 vs 14 August 2008
Texture fill rate 14.4 GTexel / s vs 12.72 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance 230.4 gflops vs 127.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 65 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 10 Watt vs 65 Watt
Maximum memory size 8 GB vs 512 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 95 vs 38

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

  • 2.1x more core clock speed: 530 MHz vs 250 MHz
  • 2.7x more pipelines: 48 vs 18
  • Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 367 vs 360
  • Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2376 vs 1635
  • Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2376 vs 1635
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 530 MHz vs 250 MHz
Pipelines 48 vs 18
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 367 vs 360
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2376 vs 1635
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2376 vs 1635

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 505
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
95
38
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
360
367
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1635
2376
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1635
2376
Name Intel HD Graphics 505 NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
Geekbench - OpenCL 1325
PassMark - G2D Mark 95 38
PassMark - G3D Mark 360 367
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1635 2376
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1635 2376
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 956
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 956
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 470
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 470

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel HD Graphics 505 NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.0 Tesla
Code name Apollo Lake GT1 G94
Launch date 1 September 2015 14 August 2008
Place in performance rating 1524 1521
Type Laptop Mobile workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $99.95
Price now $99.95
Value for money (0-100) 7.66

Technical info

Boost clock speed 800 MHz
Core clock speed 250 MHz 530 MHz
Floating-point performance 230.4 gflops 127.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 65 nm
Pipelines 18 48
Texture fill rate 14.4 GTexel / s 12.72 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 10 Watt 65 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 505 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 MXM-HE
Laptop size large

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 10.0
OpenGL 4.5 3.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 512 MB
Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit 256 Bit
Memory type DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 GDDR3
Shared memory 1 0
Memory bandwidth 51.1 GB / s
Memory clock speed 1598 MHz

Technologies

Quick Sync
PowerMizer 8.0
PureVideo HD