Intel HD Graphics 505 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 505 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 505

• Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 13% higher texture fill rate: 14.4 GTexel / s vs 12.72 GTexel / s
• Around 81% better floating-point performance: 230.4 gflops vs 127.2 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
• 6.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 65 Watt
• 16x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 512 MB
• 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 95 vs 38

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

• 2.1x more core clock speed: 530 MHz vs 250 MHz
• 2.7x more pipelines: 48 vs 18
• Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 367 vs 363
• Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2376 vs 1635
• Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2376 vs 1635

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 505
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	95 38
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	363 367
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1635 2376
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1635 2376

Compare specifications (specs)