Intel HD Graphics 505 vs NVIDIA GRID K1

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 505 and NVIDIA GRID K1 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 505

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 13x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 130 Watt
  • 5.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1635 vs 319
  • 5.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1635 vs 319
  • 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 956 vs 354
  • 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 956 vs 354
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 September 2015 vs 18 March 2013
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 10 Watt vs 130 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1635 vs 319
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1635 vs 319
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 956 vs 354
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 956 vs 354

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K1

  • 3.4x more core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 250 MHz
  • 28.7x more texture fill rate: 4x 13.6 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 14.4 GTexel / s
  • 42.7x more pipelines: 4x 192 vs 18
  • 5.7x better floating-point performance: 4x 326.4 gflops vs 230.4 gflops
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 4x 4 GB vs 8 GB
  • Around 48% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1976 vs 1333
  • 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 259 vs 95
  • Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 651 vs 363
  • 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1237 vs 470
  • 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1237 vs 470
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 850 MHz vs 250 MHz
Texture fill rate 4x 13.6 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 14.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines 4x 192 vs 18
Floating-point performance 4x 326.4 gflops vs 230.4 gflops
Maximum memory size 4x 4 GB vs 8 GB
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 1976 vs 1333
PassMark - G2D Mark 259 vs 95
PassMark - G3D Mark 651 vs 363
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1237 vs 470
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1237 vs 470

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 505
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID K1

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
1333
1976
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
95
259
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
363
651
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1635
319
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1635
319
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
956
354
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
956
354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
470
1237
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
470
1237
Name Intel HD Graphics 505 NVIDIA GRID K1
Geekbench - OpenCL 1333 1976
PassMark - G2D Mark 95 259
PassMark - G3D Mark 363 651
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1635 319
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1635 319
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 956 354
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 956 354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 470 1237
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 470 1237
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 4.591
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 169.864
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.336
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 8.734
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 10.43

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel HD Graphics 505 NVIDIA GRID K1

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.0 Kepler
Code name Apollo Lake GT1 GK107
Launch date 1 September 2015 18 March 2013
Place in performance rating 1524 1525
Type Laptop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $4,140

Technical info

Boost clock speed 800 MHz
Core clock speed 250 MHz 850 MHz
Floating-point performance 230.4 gflops 4x 326.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 18 4x 192
Texture fill rate 14.4 GTexel / s 4x 13.6 GTexel / s billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 10 Watt 130 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 1,270 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 267 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.6

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4x 4 GB
Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit 4x 128 Bit
Memory type DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 DDR3
Shared memory 1
Memory bandwidth 4x 28.51 GB / s
Memory clock speed 1782 MHz

Technologies

Quick Sync