Intel HD Graphics 510 vs AMD Radeon HD 7480D
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 510 and AMD Radeon HD 7480D videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 510
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 31% higher boost clock speed: 950 MHz vs 724 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 32 nm
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 625 vs 279
- Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 163 vs 119
- 3.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2471 vs 678
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 902 vs 348
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1333 vs 1235
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1786 vs 1704
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 902 vs 348
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1333 vs 1235
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1786 vs 1704
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 26 September 2012 |
Boost clock speed | 950 MHz vs 724 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 32 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 625 vs 279 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 163 vs 119 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2471 vs 678 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 902 vs 348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1333 vs 1235 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1786 vs 1704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 902 vs 348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1333 vs 1235 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1786 vs 1704 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7480D
- 2x more core clock speed: 614 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 10.7x more pipelines: 128 vs 12
Core clock speed | 614 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 128 vs 12 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 510
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7480D
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 510 | AMD Radeon HD 7480D |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 625 | 279 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 163 | 119 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2471 | 678 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.381 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 215.873 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.081 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.675 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 15.094 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 902 | 348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1333 | 1235 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1786 | 1704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 902 | 348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1333 | 1235 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1786 | 1704 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 510 | AMD Radeon HD 7480D | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Terascale 3 |
Code name | Skylake GT1 | Trinity |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 26 September 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1497 | 1491 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 950 MHz | 724 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 614 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 182.4 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 32 nm |
Pipelines | 12 | 128 |
Texture fill rate | 11.4 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Transistor count | 189 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Memory type | LPDDR3 / DDR4 | |
Shared memory | 1 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |