Intel HD Graphics 510 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 510 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 510

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
• 64x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 512 MB
• Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.381 vs 11.245
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.081 vs 0.785
• 28.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 902 vs 31.3
• 30.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1333 vs 43.4
• 19.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1786 vs 91.5

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition

• 3.2x more core clock speed: 950 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 2.7x more texture fill rate: 30.4 GTexel / s vs 11.4 GTexel / s
• 32x more pipelines: 384 vs 12
• 4x better floating-point performance: 729.6 gflops vs 182.4 gflops
• Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 301.554 vs 215.873
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 16.08 vs 11.675
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 16.56 vs 15.094
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1848 vs 902
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2690 vs 1333
• 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5125 vs 1786

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 510
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14.381 11.245
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	215.873 301.554
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.081 0.785
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11.675 16.08
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.094 16.56
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	902 1848
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1333 2690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1786 5125
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	902 31.3
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1333 43.4
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1786 91.5

Compare specifications (specs)