Intel HD Graphics 510 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 510 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 510
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 6% higher texture fill rate: 11.4 GTexel / s vs 10.8 billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
- 32x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 625 vs 479
- Around 86% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 162 vs 87
- Around 17% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2471 vs 2118
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.381 vs 4.85
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 215.873 vs 195.796
- Around 93% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.081 vs 0.561
- Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 11.675 vs 9.109
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 5 January 2011 |
Texture fill rate | 11.4 GTexel / s vs 10.8 billion / sec |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 625 vs 479 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 162 vs 87 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2471 vs 2118 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.381 vs 4.85 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 215.873 vs 195.796 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.081 vs 0.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.675 vs 9.109 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 672 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 8x more pipelines: 96 vs 12
- Around 41% better floating-point performance: 258.05 gflops vs 182.4 gflops
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 16.727 vs 15.094
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 960 vs 902
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2210 vs 1333
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2701 vs 1786
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 960 vs 902
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2210 vs 1333
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2701 vs 1786
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 672 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 96 vs 12 |
Floating-point performance | 258.05 gflops vs 182.4 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.727 vs 15.094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 960 vs 902 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2210 vs 1333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2701 vs 1786 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 960 vs 902 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2210 vs 1333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2701 vs 1786 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 510
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 510 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 625 | 479 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 162 | 87 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2471 | 2118 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.381 | 4.85 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 215.873 | 195.796 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.081 | 0.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.675 | 9.109 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 15.094 | 16.727 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 902 | 960 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1333 | 2210 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1786 | 2701 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 902 | 960 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1333 | 2210 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1786 | 2701 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 510 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Skylake GT1 | GF108 |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 5 January 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1496 | 1500 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 950 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 672 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 182.4 gflops | 258.05 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 12 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 11.4 GTexel / s | 10.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 585 million |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory type | LPDDR3 / DDR4 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |