Intel HD Graphics 510 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 430
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 510 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 510
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 2% higher texture fill rate: 11.4 GTexel / s vs 11.2 billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 49 Watt
- 32x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 622 vs 600
- Around 6% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2381 vs 2240
- 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.381 vs 3.396
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 215.873 vs 87.094
- 4.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.081 vs 0.243
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 11.675 vs 5.005
- 4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 15.094 vs 3.764
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1786 vs 1624
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1786 vs 1624
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 11 October 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 11.4 GTexel / s vs 11.2 billion / sec |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 49 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 622 vs 600 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2381 vs 2240 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.381 vs 3.396 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 215.873 vs 87.094 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.081 vs 0.243 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.675 vs 5.005 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 15.094 vs 3.764 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1786 vs 1624 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1786 vs 1624 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 430
- 4.7x more core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 8x more pipelines: 96 vs 12
- Around 47% better floating-point performance: 268.8 gflops vs 182.4 gflops
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 199 vs 162
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1080 vs 902
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1713 vs 1333
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1080 vs 902
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1713 vs 1333
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 96 vs 12 |
Floating-point performance | 268.8 gflops vs 182.4 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 199 vs 162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1080 vs 902 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1713 vs 1333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1080 vs 902 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1713 vs 1333 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 510
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 430
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 510 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 622 | 600 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 162 | 199 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2381 | 2240 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.381 | 3.396 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 215.873 | 87.094 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.081 | 0.243 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.675 | 5.005 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 15.094 | 3.764 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 902 | 1080 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1333 | 1713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1786 | 1624 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 902 | 1080 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1333 | 1713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1786 | 1624 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 510 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Skylake GT1 | GF108 |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 11 October 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1502 | 1500 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $79 | |
Price now | $35.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 20.89 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 950 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 182.4 gflops | 268.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 12 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 11.4 GTexel / s | 11.2 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 49 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 585 million |
CUDA cores per GPU | 96 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, HDMIVGA (optional)Mini HDMIDual Link DVI |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
Height | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory type | LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 - 28.8 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 800 - 900 MHz (1600 - 1800 data rate) | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA |