Intel HD Graphics 510 vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 510 and NVIDIA Quadro 3000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 510

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 6 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
  • 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
  • 16x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 2 GB
  • Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.381 vs 10.95
  • Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.081 vs 0.865
  • 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 902 vs 218
  • 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1333 vs 374
  • 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1786 vs 543
  • 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 902 vs 218
  • 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1333 vs 374
  • 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1786 vs 543
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 September 2015 vs 22 February 2011
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
Maximum memory size 32 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 14.381 vs 10.95
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.081 vs 0.865
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 902 vs 218
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1333 vs 374
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1786 vs 543
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 902 vs 218
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1333 vs 374
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1786 vs 543

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

  • Around 50% higher core clock speed: 450 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • Around 58% higher texture fill rate: 18 GTexel / s vs 11.4 GTexel / s
  • 20x more pipelines: 240 vs 12
  • 2.4x better floating-point performance: 432.0 gflops vs 182.4 gflops
  • Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 995 vs 622
  • Around 93% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 312 vs 162
  • Around 60% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3809 vs 2381
  • Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 325.007 vs 215.873
  • Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.794 vs 11.675
  • Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 27.961 vs 15.094
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 450 MHz vs 300 MHz
Texture fill rate 18 GTexel / s vs 11.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines 240 vs 12
Floating-point performance 432.0 gflops vs 182.4 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 995 vs 622
PassMark - G2D Mark 312 vs 162
Geekbench - OpenCL 3809 vs 2381
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 325.007 vs 215.873
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 13.794 vs 11.675
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 27.961 vs 15.094

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 510
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
622
995
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
162
312
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
2381
3809
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
14.381
10.95
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
215.873
325.007
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1.081
0.865
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
11.675
13.794
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
15.094
27.961
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
902
218
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1333
374
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1786
543
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
902
218
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1333
374
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1786
543
Name Intel HD Graphics 510 NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
PassMark - G3D Mark 622 995
PassMark - G2D Mark 162 312
Geekbench - OpenCL 2381 3809
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 14.381 10.95
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 215.873 325.007
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.081 0.865
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 11.675 13.794
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 15.094 27.961
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 902 218
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1333 374
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1786 543
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 902 218
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1333 374
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1786 543
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel HD Graphics 510 NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.0 Fermi
Code name Skylake GT1 GF104
Launch date 1 September 2015 22 February 2011
Place in performance rating 1502 1500
Type Laptop Mobile workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $398.96
Price now $199.95
Value for money (0-100) 7.98

Technical info

Boost clock speed 950 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 450 MHz
Floating-point performance 182.4 gflops 432.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 12 240
Texture fill rate 11.4 GTexel / s 18 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 75 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 1,950 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 MXM-B (3.0)
Laptop size large

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.6

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 2 GB
Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit 256 Bit
Memory type LPDDR3 / DDR4 GDDR5
Shared memory 1 0
Memory bandwidth 80.0 GB / s
Memory clock speed 2500 MHz

Technologies

Quick Sync