Intel HD Graphics 515 vs AMD Radeon HD 6570

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 515 and AMD Radeon HD 6570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

Intel HD Graphics 515

AMD Radeon HD 6570

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 515

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 6 month(s) later
Around 46% higher boost clock speed: 950 MHz vs 650 MHz
1461.5x more texture fill rate: 22.80 GTexel/s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
2.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 40 Watt
16x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 1 GB
Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 633 vs 557
Around 86% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2868 vs 1545

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	1 September 2015 vs 7 February 2011
Boost clock speed	950 MHz vs 650 MHz
Texture fill rate	22.80 GTexel/s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 40 Watt
Maximum memory size	16 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	633 vs 557
Geekbench - OpenCL	2868 vs 1545

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6570

20x more pipelines: 480 vs 24
Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 219 vs 190
2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1296 vs 455
2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1296 vs 455
Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1044 vs 881
Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1044 vs 881
Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2716 vs 1657
Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2716 vs 1657

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	480 vs 24
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	219 vs 190
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1296 vs 455
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1296 vs 455
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1044 vs 881
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1044 vs 881
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2716 vs 1657
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2716 vs 1657

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 515
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6570

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

190

219

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

633

557

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

2868

1545

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

455

1296

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

455

1296

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

881

1044

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

881

1044

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1657

2716

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1657

2716

Name	Intel HD Graphics 515	AMD Radeon HD 6570
PassMark - G2D Mark	190	219
PassMark - G3D Mark	633	557
Geekbench - OpenCL	2868	1545
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	455	1296
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	455	1296
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	881	1044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	881	1044
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1657	2716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1657	2716
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		4.278
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		255.525
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		0.464
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		13.633
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		59.183
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		846

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel HD Graphics 515	AMD Radeon HD 6570
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 9.0	TeraScale 2
Code name	Skylake GT2	Thames
Launch date	1 September 2015	7 February 2011
Place in performance rating	1425	1428
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Design		AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series
Launch price (MSRP)		$79
Price now		$49.99
Value for money (0-100)		19.92
Technical info
Boost clock speed	950 MHz	650 MHz
Core clock speed	300 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	40 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	91.20 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	729.6 GFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	364.8 GFLOPS
Pipelines	24	480
Pixel fill rate	2.850 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	22.80 GTexel/s	15.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	40 Watt
Floating-point performance		624.0 gflops
Stream Processors		480
Transistor count		716 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
VGA
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus support		PCIe 2.1 x16
Length		168 mm
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12	11
OpenCL	2.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	1 GB
Memory bus width	64 / 128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory type	DDR3L / LPDDR3	GDDR5
Shared memory	Yes
Memory bandwidth		28.8 GB/s
Memory clock speed		900 MHz
Technologies
Quick Sync
AMD Eyefinity
CrossFire
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)