Intel HD Graphics 515 vs NVIDIA NVS 5400M

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 515 and NVIDIA NVS 5400M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

Intel HD Graphics 515

NVIDIA NVS 5400M

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 515

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
2159.1x more texture fill rate: 22.80 GTexel/s vs 10.56 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
8x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 2 GB
Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 190 vs 187
Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 633 vs 626
Around 20% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2868 vs 2386

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	1 September 2015 vs 1 June 2012
Texture fill rate	22.80 GTexel/s vs 10.56 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 35 Watt
Maximum memory size	16 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	190 vs 187
PassMark - G3D Mark	633 vs 626
Geekbench - OpenCL	2868 vs 2386

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 5400M

2.2x more core clock speed: 660 MHz vs 300 MHz
4x more pipelines: 96 vs 24
2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1069 vs 455
2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1069 vs 455
Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1652 vs 881
Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1652 vs 881
Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2282 vs 1657
Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2282 vs 1657

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	660 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines	96 vs 24
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1069 vs 455
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1069 vs 455
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1652 vs 881
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1652 vs 881
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2282 vs 1657
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2282 vs 1657

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 515
GPU 2: NVIDIA NVS 5400M

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

190

187

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

633

626

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

2868

2386

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

455

1069

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

455

1069

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

881

1652

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

881

1652

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1657

2282

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1657

2282

Name	Intel HD Graphics 515	NVIDIA NVS 5400M
PassMark - G2D Mark	190	187
PassMark - G3D Mark	633	626
Geekbench - OpenCL	2868	2386
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	455	1069
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	455	1069
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	881	1652
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	881	1652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1657	2282
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1657	2282
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		5.068
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		229.562
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		0.635
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		11.384
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		19.696

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel HD Graphics 515	NVIDIA NVS 5400M
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 9.0	Fermi
Code name	Skylake GT2	GF108
Launch date	1 September 2015	1 June 2012
Place in performance rating	1425	1427
Type	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	950 MHz
Core clock speed	300 MHz	660 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	40 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	91.20 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	729.6 GFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	364.8 GFLOPS
Pipelines	24	96
Pixel fill rate	2.850 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	22.80 GTexel/s	10.56 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	35 Watt
Floating-point performance		253.4 gflops
Transistor count		585 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	MXM
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL	2.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	64 / 128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory type	DDR3L / LPDDR3	DDR3
Shared memory	Yes	0
Memory bandwidth		28.8 GB / s
Memory clock speed		1800 MHz
Technologies
Quick Sync
3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
CUDA
DirectCompute
DirectX 11		DirectX 11
Optimus