Intel HD Graphics 515 vs NVIDIA Quadro K620M

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 515 and NVIDIA Quadro K620M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 515

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
  • 1268.1x more texture fill rate: 22.80 GTexel/s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 30 Watt
  • 8x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 2 GB
  • Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 191 vs 158
  • Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1657 vs 1349
  • Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1657 vs 1349
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 September 2015 vs 1 March 2015
Texture fill rate 22.80 GTexel/s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 30 Watt
Maximum memory size 16 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 191 vs 158
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1657 vs 1349
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1657 vs 1349

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K620M

  • 3.4x more core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
  • Around 84% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1165 vs 633
  • Around 61% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4583 vs 2843
  • 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1291 vs 455
  • 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1291 vs 455
  • Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 927 vs 881
  • Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 927 vs 881
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1029 MHz vs 300 MHz
Boost clock speed 1124 MHz vs 950 MHz
Pipelines 384 vs 24
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1165 vs 633
Geekbench - OpenCL 4583 vs 2843
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1291 vs 455
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1291 vs 455
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 927 vs 881
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 927 vs 881

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 515
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K620M

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
191
158
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
633
1165
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
2843
4583
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
455
1291
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
455
1291
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
881
927
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
881
927
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1657
1349
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1657
1349
Name Intel HD Graphics 515 NVIDIA Quadro K620M
PassMark - G2D Mark 191 158
PassMark - G3D Mark 633 1165
Geekbench - OpenCL 2843 4583
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 455 1291
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 455 1291
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 881 927
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 881 927
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1657 1349
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1657 1349
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 23.872
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 165.904
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 91.813

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel HD Graphics 515 NVIDIA Quadro K620M

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.0 Maxwell
Code name Skylake GT2 GM108
Launch date 1 September 2015 1 March 2015
Place in performance rating 1428 1429
Type Laptop Mobile workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 950 MHz 1124 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 1029 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 91.20 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 729.6 GFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 364.8 GFLOPS
Pipelines 24 384
Pixel fill rate 2.850 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 22.80 GTexel/s 17.98 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 30 Watt
Floating-point performance 863.2 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
Display Port 1.2

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12 12
OpenCL 2.1
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.4 5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 2 GB
Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit 64 Bit
Memory type DDR3L / LPDDR3 DDR3
Shared memory Yes 0
Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB / s
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz

Technologies

Quick Sync
3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
CUDA
nView Display Management
Optimus