Intel HD Graphics 515 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 515 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 515
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 26% higher boost clock speed: 950 MHz vs 753 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
- 8x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 72% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 191 vs 111
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 27 October 2011 |
| Boost clock speed | 950 MHz vs 753 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 35 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 191 vs 111 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M
- 6x more pipelines: 144 vs 24
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 654 vs 633
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1134 vs 455
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1134 vs 455
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2265 vs 881
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2265 vs 881
- Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2827 vs 1657
- Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2827 vs 1657
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 144 vs 24 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 654 vs 633 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2859 vs 2848 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1134 vs 455 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1134 vs 455 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2265 vs 881 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2265 vs 881 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2827 vs 1657 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2827 vs 1657 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 515
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 515 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 191 | 111 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 633 | 654 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2848 | 2859 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 455 | 1134 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 455 | 1134 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 881 | 2265 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 881 | 2265 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1657 | 2827 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1657 | 2827 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.699 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 252.895 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.727 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.581 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 21.909 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics 515 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | Skylake GT2 | GF106 |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 27 October 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 1427 | 1430 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 950 MHz | 753 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 91.20 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 729.6 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 364.8 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 24 | 144 |
| Pixel fill rate | 2.850 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 22.80 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
| CUDA cores | Up to 144 | |
| Floating-point performance | 388.8 gflops | |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 API |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 | DDR3\DDR5 |
| Shared memory | Yes | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel HD Graphics 515 with others
IntelHD Graphics 515 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8300
IntelHD Graphics 515 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 555M
IntelHD Graphics 515 vs
NVIDIANVS 510
IntelHD Graphics 515 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K620M
IntelHD Graphics 515 vs
IntelIris Xe Graphics G7 80EU
IntelHD Graphics 515 vs
IntelIris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
