Intel HD Graphics 515 vs NVIDIA NVS 510

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 515 and NVIDIA NVS 510 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 515

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
  • 1788.2x more texture fill rate: 22.80 GTexel/s vs 12.75 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
  • 8x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 2 GB
  • Around 67% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2848 vs 1709
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 September 2015 vs 23 October 2012
Texture fill rate 22.80 GTexel/s vs 12.75 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
Maximum memory size 16 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 2848 vs 1709

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 510

  • 2.7x more core clock speed: 797 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 8x more pipelines: 192 vs 24
  • Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 288 vs 191
  • Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 697 vs 633
  • 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1211 vs 455
  • 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1211 vs 455
  • Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 976 vs 881
  • Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 976 vs 881
  • Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1720 vs 1657
  • Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1720 vs 1657
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 797 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines 192 vs 24
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 288 vs 191
PassMark - G3D Mark 697 vs 633
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1211 vs 455
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1211 vs 455
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 976 vs 881
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 976 vs 881
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1720 vs 1657
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1720 vs 1657

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 515
GPU 2: NVIDIA NVS 510

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
191
288
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
633
697
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
2848
1709
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
455
1211
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
455
1211
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
881
976
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
881
976
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1657
1720
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1657
1720
Name Intel HD Graphics 515 NVIDIA NVS 510
PassMark - G2D Mark 191 288
PassMark - G3D Mark 633 697
Geekbench - OpenCL 2848 1709
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 455 1211
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 455 1211
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 881 976
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 881 976
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1657 1720
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1657 1720
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 6.809
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 111.269
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.399
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 7.769
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 9.522

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel HD Graphics 515 NVIDIA NVS 510

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.0 Kepler
Code name Skylake GT2 GK107
Launch date 1 September 2015 23 October 2012
Place in performance rating 1427 1429
Type Laptop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $449

Technical info

Boost clock speed 950 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 797 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 91.20 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 729.6 GFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 364.8 GFLOPS
Pipelines 24 192
Pixel fill rate 2.850 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 22.80 GTexel/s 12.75 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt
Floating-point performance 306.0 gflops
Transistor count 1,270 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 4x mini-DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 160 mm
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12 12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL 2.1
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 2 GB
Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory type DDR3L / LPDDR3 DDR3
Shared memory Yes
Memory bandwidth 28.51 GB / s
Memory clock speed 1782 MHz

Technologies

Quick Sync