Intel HD Graphics 515 vs NVIDIA NVS 510

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 515 and NVIDIA NVS 510 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

Intel HD Graphics 515

NVIDIA NVS 510

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 515

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
1788.2x more texture fill rate: 22.80 GTexel/s vs 12.75 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
8x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 2 GB
Around 66% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2835 vs 1704

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	1 September 2015 vs 23 October 2012
Texture fill rate	22.80 GTexel/s vs 12.75 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 35 Watt
Maximum memory size	16 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	2835 vs 1704

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 510

2.7x more core clock speed: 797 MHz vs 300 MHz
8x more pipelines: 192 vs 24
Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 288 vs 190
Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 691 vs 634
2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1211 vs 455
2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1211 vs 455
Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 976 vs 881
Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 976 vs 881
Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1720 vs 1657
Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1720 vs 1657

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	797 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines	192 vs 24
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	288 vs 190
PassMark - G3D Mark	691 vs 634
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1211 vs 455
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1211 vs 455
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	976 vs 881
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	976 vs 881
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1720 vs 1657
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1720 vs 1657

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 515
GPU 2: NVIDIA NVS 510

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

190

288

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

634

691

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

2835

1704

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

455

1211

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

455

1211

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

881

976

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

881

976

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1657

1720

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1657

1720

Name	Intel HD Graphics 515	NVIDIA NVS 510
PassMark - G2D Mark	190	288
PassMark - G3D Mark	634	691
Geekbench - OpenCL	2835	1704
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	455	1211
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	455	1211
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	881	976
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	881	976
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1657	1720
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1657	1720
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		6.809
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		111.269
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		0.399
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		7.769
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		9.522

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel HD Graphics 515	NVIDIA NVS 510
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 9.0	Kepler
Code name	Skylake GT2	GK107
Launch date	1 September 2015	23 October 2012
Place in performance rating	1428	1430
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$449
Technical info
Boost clock speed	950 MHz
Core clock speed	300 MHz	797 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	91.20 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	729.6 GFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	364.8 GFLOPS
Pipelines	24	192
Pixel fill rate	2.850 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	22.80 GTexel/s	12.75 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	35 Watt
Floating-point performance		306.0 gflops
Transistor count		1,270 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	4x mini-DisplayPort
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length		160 mm
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL	2.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	64 / 128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory type	DDR3L / LPDDR3	DDR3
Shared memory	Yes
Memory bandwidth		28.51 GB / s
Memory clock speed		1782 MHz
Technologies
Quick Sync