Intel HD Graphics 515 vs NVIDIA NVS 510
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 515 and NVIDIA NVS 510 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 515
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 1788.2x more texture fill rate: 22.80 GTexel/s vs 12.75 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
- 8x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 67% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2846 vs 1706
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 23 October 2012 |
Texture fill rate | 22.80 GTexel/s vs 12.75 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2846 vs 1706 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 510
- 2.7x more core clock speed: 797 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 8x more pipelines: 192 vs 24
- Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 288 vs 191
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 692 vs 633
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1211 vs 455
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1211 vs 455
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 976 vs 881
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 976 vs 881
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1720 vs 1657
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1720 vs 1657
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 797 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 192 vs 24 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 288 vs 191 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 692 vs 633 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1211 vs 455 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1211 vs 455 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 976 vs 881 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 976 vs 881 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1720 vs 1657 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1720 vs 1657 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 515
GPU 2: NVIDIA NVS 510
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 515 | NVIDIA NVS 510 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 191 | 288 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 633 | 692 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2846 | 1706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 455 | 1211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 455 | 1211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 881 | 976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 881 | 976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1657 | 1720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1657 | 1720 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.809 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 111.269 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.399 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.769 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 9.522 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 515 | NVIDIA NVS 510 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Skylake GT2 | GK107 |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 23 October 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1428 | 1430 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $449 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 950 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 797 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 91.20 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 729.6 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 364.8 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 24 | 192 |
Pixel fill rate | 2.850 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 22.80 GTexel/s | 12.75 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 306.0 gflops | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 160 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | Yes | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |