Intel HD Graphics 515 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 515 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

Intel HD Graphics 515

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 515

Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 0 month(s) later
527.8x more texture fill rate: 22.80 GTexel/s vs 43.2 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
6.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 100 Watt
16x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 1 GB
4.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 191 vs 42
Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 635 vs 575

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	1 September 2015 vs 14 August 2008
Texture fill rate	22.80 GTexel/s vs 43.2 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 65 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 100 Watt
Maximum memory size	16 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	191 vs 42
PassMark - G3D Mark	635 vs 575

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

2.3x more core clock speed: 675 MHz vs 300 MHz
5.3x more pipelines: 128 vs 24
Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3272 vs 1657
Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3272 vs 1657

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	675 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines	128 vs 24
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3272 vs 1657
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3272 vs 1657

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 515
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

191

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

635

575

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1657

3272

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1657

3272

Name	Intel HD Graphics 515	NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
PassMark - G2D Mark	191	42
PassMark - G3D Mark	635	575
Geekbench - OpenCL	2848
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	455
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	455
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	881
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	881
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1657	3272
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1657	3272

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel HD Graphics 515	NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 9.0	Tesla
Code name	Skylake GT2	G92
Launch date	1 September 2015	14 August 2008
Place in performance rating	1432	1429
Type	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	950 MHz
Core clock speed	300 MHz	675 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	65 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	91.20 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	729.6 GFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	364.8 GFLOPS
Pipelines	24	128
Pixel fill rate	2.850 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	22.80 GTexel/s	43.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	100 Watt
Floating-point performance		422.4 gflops
Transistor count		754 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	MXM-B (3.0)
Laptop size		large
API support
DirectX	12	10.0
OpenCL	2.1
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	1 GB
Memory bus width	64 / 128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory type	DDR3L / LPDDR3	GDDR3
Shared memory	Yes	0
Memory bandwidth		64.0 GB / s
Memory clock speed		2000 MHz
Technologies
Quick Sync
CUDA
PowerMizer 8.0