Intel HD Graphics 530 vs AMD Radeon HD 6350

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 530 and AMD Radeon HD 6350 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

Intel HD Graphics 530

AMD Radeon HD 6350

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 530

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 6 month(s) later
4.8x more texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s
3.9x better floating-point performance: 403.2 gflops vs 104 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
Around 27% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 19 Watt
128x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 512 MB
7.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 995 vs 141
Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 254 vs 171
Around 53% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4397 vs 2872
11.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.804 vs 0.154
3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 30.177 vs 10.131
2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1045 vs 381
3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2393 vs 734
Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 1717
2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1045 vs 381
3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2393 vs 734
Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 1717

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	1 September 2015 vs 7 February 2011
Texture fill rate	25.2 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance	403.2 gflops vs 104 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 19 Watt
Maximum memory size	64 GB vs 512 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	995 vs 141
PassMark - G2D Mark	254 vs 171
Geekbench - OpenCL	4397 vs 2872
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.804 vs 0.154
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	30.177 vs 10.131
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1045 vs 381
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2393 vs 734
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3346 vs 1717
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1045 vs 381
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2393 vs 734
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3346 vs 1717

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6350

Around 86% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 350 MHz
3.3x more pipelines: 80 vs 24

Core clock speed	650 MHz vs 350 MHz
Pipelines	80 vs 24

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 530
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6350

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

995

141

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

254

171

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

4397

2872

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1.804

0.154

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

30.177

10.131

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1045

381

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2393

734

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3346

1717

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1045

381

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2393

734

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3346

1717

Name	Intel HD Graphics 530	AMD Radeon HD 6350
PassMark - G3D Mark	995	141
PassMark - G2D Mark	254	171
Geekbench - OpenCL	4397	2872
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	30.747
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	330.464
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.804	0.154
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	19.781
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	30.177	10.131
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1045	381
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2393	734
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3346	1717
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1045	381
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2393	734
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3346	1717
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	384

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel HD Graphics 530	AMD Radeon HD 6350
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 9.0	TeraScale 2
Code name	Skylake GT2	Cedar
Launch date	1 September 2015	7 February 2011
Place in performance rating	1248	1544
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$23
Price now		$50.99
Value for money (0-100)		5.17
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1150 MHz
Core clock speed	350 MHz	650 MHz
Floating-point performance	403.2 gflops	104 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	24	80
Texture fill rate	25.2 GTexel / s	5.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	19 Watt
Transistor count	189 million	292 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length		168 mm
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	11.2 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	64 GB	512 MB
Memory bus width	64 / 128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory type	DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4	GDDR3
Shared memory	1
Memory bandwidth		6.4 GB / s
Memory clock speed		800 MHz