Intel HD Graphics 530 vs AMD Radeon HD 6770

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 530 and AMD Radeon HD 6770 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 530

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 28% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 900 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• 7.2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 108 Watt
• 64x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 16% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4397 vs 3802
• 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.747 vs 9.69
• Around 80% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.804 vs 1.004
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2393 vs 2279
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2393 vs 2279

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6770

• Around 35% higher texture fill rate: 34.0 GTexel / s vs 25.2 GTexel / s
• 33.3x more pipelines: 800 vs 24
• 3.4x better floating-point performance: 1,360.0 gflops vs 403.2 gflops
• Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1262 vs 995
• Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 318 vs 254
• Around 86% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 615.217 vs 330.464
• Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 26.748 vs 19.781
• 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 115.157 vs 30.177
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2546 vs 1045
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2546 vs 1045

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 530
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6770

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	995 1262
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	254 318
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4397 3802
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.747 9.69
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	330.464 615.217
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.804 1.004
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.781 26.748
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.177 115.157
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1045 2546
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2393 2279
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1045 2546
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2393 2279
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 3358

Compare specifications (specs)