Intel HD Graphics 530 vs AMD Radeon R5 M320
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 530 and AMD Radeon R5 M320 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 530
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 855 MHz
- Around 47% higher texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 17.1 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 4 GB
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 995 vs 467
- Around 81% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 254 vs 140
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.747 vs 12.564
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 5 May 2015 |
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 855 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s vs 17.1 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 995 vs 467 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 254 vs 140 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.747 vs 12.564 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M320
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 780 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 13.3x more pipelines: 320 vs 24
- Around 36% better floating-point performance: 547.2 gflops vs 403.2 gflops
- Around 14% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5002 vs 4397
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1202 vs 1045
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1202 vs 1045
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 780 MHz vs 350 MHz |
| Pipelines | 320 vs 24 |
| Floating-point performance | 547.2 gflops vs 403.2 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5002 vs 4397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1202 vs 1045 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1202 vs 1045 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 530
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 M320
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 530 | AMD Radeon R5 M320 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 995 | 467 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 254 | 140 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4397 | 5002 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.747 | 12.564 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 330.464 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.804 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.781 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.177 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1045 | 1202 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2393 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1045 | 1202 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2393 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 384 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics 530 | AMD Radeon R5 M320 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Skylake GT2 | Jet |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 5 May 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 1248 | 1402 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R5 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | 855 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 780 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 403.2 gflops | 547.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 320 |
| Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s | 17.1 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,040 million |
| Compute units | 5 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 bit |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
| Memory bandwidth | 16 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| DualGraphics | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel HD Graphics 530 with others
IntelHD Graphics 530 vs
ATIRadeon 9800 SE
IntelHD Graphics 530 vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 MX 4000
IntelHD Graphics 530 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K2000M
IntelHD Graphics 530 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
IntelHD Graphics 530 vs
NVIDIAGRID K180Q
IntelHD Graphics 530 vs
AMDRadeon 620
