Intel HD Graphics 530 vs Intel HD Graphics 2000

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 530 and Intel HD Graphics 2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 530

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• 4x more pipelines: 24 vs 6
• 39.5x better floating-point performance: 403.2 gflops vs 10.2 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 32 nm
• 4.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 995 vs 213
• 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 1039
• 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 1039

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 2000

• 2.4x more core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 350 MHz
• 33.7x more texture fill rate: 850 MTexel / s vs 25.2 GTexel / s
• Around 80% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 456 vs 254

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 530
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 2000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	995 213
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	254 456
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 1039
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 1039

Compare specifications (specs)