Intel HD Graphics 530 vs Intel HD Graphics 2500
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 530 and Intel HD Graphics 2500 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 530
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 21.9x more texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 1.15 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 24 vs 6
- 29.2x better floating-point performance: 403.2 gflops vs 13.8 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 22 nm
- 17.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4397 vs 249
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 1 April 2012 |
Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s vs 1.15 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 24 vs 6 |
Floating-point performance | 403.2 gflops vs 13.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 22 nm |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4397 vs 249 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 2500
- Around 86% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 350 MHz
Core clock speed | 650 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 530
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 2500
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 530 | Intel HD Graphics 2500 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 995 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 254 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4397 | 249 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.747 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 330.464 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.804 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.781 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.177 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1045 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2393 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1045 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2393 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 384 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 530 | Intel HD Graphics 2500 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Generation 7.0 |
Code name | Skylake GT2 | Ivy Bridge GT1 |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 1 April 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1248 | 1710 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 650 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 403.2 gflops | 13.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 6 |
Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s | 1.15 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 392 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11.1 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.0 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | |
Shared memory | 1 | 1 |