Intel HD Graphics 530 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 520
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 530 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 530
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 3.9x more texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 6.5 billion / sec
- 2.6x better floating-point performance: 403.2 gflops vs 155.52 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 93% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 29 Watt
- 64x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 1 GB (DDR3)
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 995 vs 319
- Around 87% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 254 vs 136
- 3.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4397 vs 1277
- 11.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.747 vs 2.597
- 4.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 330.464 vs 76.214
- 7.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.804 vs 0.239
- 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.781 vs 5.862
- 6.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 30.177 vs 4.574
- Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1045 vs 545
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2393 vs 903
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 1455
- Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1045 vs 545
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2393 vs 903
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 1455
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 13 April 2011 |
Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s vs 6.5 billion / sec |
Floating-point performance | 403.2 gflops vs 155.52 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 29 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 1 GB (DDR3) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 995 vs 319 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 254 vs 136 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4397 vs 1277 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.747 vs 2.597 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 330.464 vs 76.214 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.804 vs 0.239 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.781 vs 5.862 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.177 vs 4.574 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1045 vs 545 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2393 vs 903 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 1455 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1045 vs 545 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2393 vs 903 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 1455 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520
- 4.6x more core clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 2x more pipelines: 48 vs 24
Core clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Pipelines | 48 vs 24 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 530
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 520
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 530 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 995 | 319 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 254 | 136 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4397 | 1277 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.747 | 2.597 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 330.464 | 76.214 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.804 | 0.239 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.781 | 5.862 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.177 | 4.574 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1045 | 545 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2393 | 903 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 1455 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1045 | 545 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2393 | 903 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 1455 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 384 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 530 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Skylake GT2 | GF119 |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 13 April 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1248 | 1603 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $59 | |
Price now | $59.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 7.58 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 1620 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 403.2 gflops | 155.52 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s | 6.5 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 29 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 292 million |
CUDA cores | 48 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 102 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-IHDMIVGA (optional) |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 2.7" (6.9 cm) | |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 1 GB (DDR3) |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz (DDR3) | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA |