Intel HD Graphics 530 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 520
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 530 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 530
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 4 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 25.2 GTexel / s versus 6.5 billion / sec
- 2.6x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 403.2 gflops versus 155.52 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 93% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 29 Watt
- 64x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 64 GB versus 1 GB (DDR3)
- 3.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 995 versus 319
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 254 versus 136
- 3.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4397 versus 1277
- 11.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.747 versus 2.597
- 4.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 330.464 versus 76.214
- 7.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.804 versus 0.239
- 3.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.781 versus 5.862
- 6.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 30.177 versus 4.574
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1045 versus 545
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2393 versus 903
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 versus 1455
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1045 versus 545
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2393 versus 903
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 versus 1455
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 versus 13 April 2011 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.2 GTexel / s versus 6.5 billion / sec |
Performance á point flottant | 403.2 gflops versus 155.52 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 29 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 64 GB versus 1 GB (DDR3) |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 995 versus 319 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 254 versus 136 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4397 versus 1277 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.747 versus 2.597 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 330.464 versus 76.214 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.804 versus 0.239 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.781 versus 5.862 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.177 versus 4.574 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1045 versus 545 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2393 versus 903 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 versus 1455 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1045 versus 545 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2393 versus 903 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 versus 1455 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 520
- 4.6x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1620 MHz versus 350 MHz
- 2x plus de pipelines: 48 versus 24
Vitesse du noyau | 1620 MHz versus 350 MHz |
Pipelines | 48 versus 24 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 530
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 520
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | Intel HD Graphics 530 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 995 | 319 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 254 | 136 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4397 | 1277 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.747 | 2.597 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 330.464 | 76.214 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.804 | 0.239 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.781 | 5.862 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.177 | 4.574 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1045 | 545 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2393 | 903 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 1455 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1045 | 545 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2393 | 903 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 1455 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 384 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel HD Graphics 530 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Nom de code | Skylake GT2 | GF119 |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 | 13 April 2011 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1248 | 1603 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $59 | |
Prix maintenant | $59.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 7.58 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz | 1620 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 403.2 gflops | 155.52 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 48 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.2 GTexel / s | 6.5 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 29 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 189 million | 292 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 48 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 102 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-IHDMIVGA (optional) |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Soutien de bus | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Hauteur | 2.7" (6.9 cm) | |
Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 64 GB | 1 GB (DDR3) |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 900 MHz (DDR3) | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA |