Intel HD Graphics 5300 vs NVIDIA Quadro K420
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 5300 and NVIDIA Quadro K420 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 5300
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 41 Watt
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 693 vs 598
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 693 vs 598
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1627 vs 1241
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1627 vs 1241
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 September 2014 vs 22 July 2014 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 41 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 693 vs 598 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 693 vs 598 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1627 vs 1241 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1627 vs 1241 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K420
- 8.8x more core clock speed: 876 MHz vs 100 MHz
- 8x more pipelines: 192 vs 24
- Around 85% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 740 vs 401
- Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 283 vs 181
- Around 25% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1847 vs 1474
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1245 vs 709
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1245 vs 709
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 876 MHz vs 100 MHz |
| Pipelines | 192 vs 24 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 740 vs 401 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 283 vs 181 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1847 vs 1474 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1245 vs 709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1245 vs 709 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 5300
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K420
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 5300 | NVIDIA Quadro K420 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 401 | 740 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 181 | 283 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1474 | 1847 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 709 | 1245 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 709 | 1245 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 693 | 598 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 693 | 598 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1627 | 1241 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1627 | 1241 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 186.605 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.433 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.365 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.75 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics 5300 | NVIDIA Quadro K420 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Broadwell GT2 | GK107 |
| Launch date | 5 September 2014 | 22 July 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 1456 | 1457 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $96.67 | |
| Price now | $89.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 10.27 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 900 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 100 MHz | 876 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 192 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 41 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,300 million | 1,270 million |
| Floating-point performance | 336.4 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 14.02 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | DVI-I DP, 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 160 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB / 2 GB | |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | |
| Memory type | 128 Bit | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Desktop Management | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel HD Graphics 5300 with others
IntelHD Graphics 5300 vs
ATIMobility FireGL 7800
IntelHD Graphics 5300 vs
ATIRadeon HD 3850
IntelHD Graphics 5300 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 735M
IntelHD Graphics 5300 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
IntelHD Graphics 5300 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K420
IntelHD Graphics 5300 vs
IntelIris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake)
