Intel HD Graphics 5500 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 5500 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 5500
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 9 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 3.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 50 Watt
- 15.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 781 versus 51
- 16x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 754 versus 47
- 23.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1397 versus 59.6
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 5 September 2014 versus 8 November 2013 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 50 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 781 versus 51 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 754 versus 47 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1397 versus 59.6 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
- 10.9x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1085 MHz versus 100 MHz
- 16x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 24
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.243 versus 3.422
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 393.811 versus 195.811
- 3.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3011 versus 781
- 3.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2916 versus 754
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3335 versus 1397
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1085 MHz versus 100 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 24 |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.243 versus 3.422 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 393.811 versus 195.811 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3011 versus 781 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2916 versus 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3335 versus 1397 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 5500
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel HD Graphics 5500 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 591 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 232 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2266 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.422 | 10.243 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 195.811 | 393.811 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 781 | 3011 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 754 | 2916 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1397 | 3335 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 781 | 51 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 754 | 47 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1397 | 59.6 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 233 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.966 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.793 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.139 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel HD Graphics 5500 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Broadwell GT2 | GK107 |
| Date de sortie | 5 September 2014 | 8 November 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1484 | 1487 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 950 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 100 MHz | 1085 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 384 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,300 million | 1,270 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 833.3 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 34.72 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80 GB / s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel HD Graphics 5500 avec des autres
IntelHD Graphics 5500 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 4000
IntelHD Graphics 5500 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 4500
IntelHD Graphics 5500 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
IntelHD Graphics 5500 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 710
IntelHD Graphics 5500 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M260
IntelHD Graphics 5500 vs
IntelHD Graphics 615
