Intel HD Graphics 610 vs Intel HD Graphics 530
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 610 and Intel HD Graphics 530 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 610
- Videocard is newer: launch date 0 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher texture fill rate: 26.4 GTexel / s vs 25.2 GTexel / s
- Around 5% better floating-point performance: 422.4 gflops vs 403.2 gflops
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 15 Watt
Launch date | 30 August 2016 vs 1 September 2015 |
Texture fill rate | 26.4 GTexel / s vs 25.2 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 422.4 gflops vs 403.2 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt vs 15 Watt |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 530
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 350 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- 2x more pipelines: 24 vs 12
- 2x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 32 GB
- Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 995 vs 693
- Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 254 vs 155
- Around 80% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4397 vs 2443
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1045 vs 1017
- 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2393 vs 464
- 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 845
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1045 vs 1017
- 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2393 vs 464
- 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 845
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Pipelines | 24 vs 12 |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 32 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 995 vs 693 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 254 vs 155 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4397 vs 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1045 vs 1017 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2393 vs 464 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 845 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1045 vs 1017 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2393 vs 464 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 845 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 610
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 530
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 610 | Intel HD Graphics 530 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 693 | 995 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 155 | 254 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2443 | 4397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1017 | 1045 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 464 | 2393 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 845 | 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1017 | 1045 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 464 | 2393 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 845 | 3346 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 384 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.747 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 330.464 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.804 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.781 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.177 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Intel HD Graphics 530 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Generation 9.0 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT1 | Skylake GT2 |
Launch date | 30 August 2016 | 1 September 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 1531 | 1248 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 350 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 422.4 gflops | 403.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 12 | 24 |
Texture fill rate | 26.4 GTexel / s | 25.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 189 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 64 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 |
Shared memory | 1 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |