Intel HD Graphics 610 vs AMD Radeon HD 8240

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 610 and AMD Radeon HD 8240 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 610

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 693 vs 246
• 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 155 vs 63
• 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2443 vs 978

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8240

• Around 33% higher core clock speed: 400 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 10.7x more pipelines: 128 vs 12
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 988 vs 464
• Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1627 vs 845
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 988 vs 464
• Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1627 vs 845

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 610
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8240

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	693 246
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	155 63
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2443 978
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	464 988
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	845 1627
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	464 988
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	845 1627

Compare specifications (specs)