Intel HD Graphics 610 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 610 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 610
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 2x more texture fill rate: 26.4 GTexel / s vs 12.96 GTexel / s
- Around 36% better floating-point performance: 422.4 gflops vs 311.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 13x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 65 Watt
- 32x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 693 vs 681
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 August 2016 vs 15 May 2012 |
Texture fill rate | 26.4 GTexel / s vs 12.96 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 422.4 gflops vs 311.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 693 vs 681 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
- 2.7x more core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 8x more pipelines: 96 vs 12
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 225 vs 155
- Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2473 vs 2443
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1151 vs 1017
- 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1853 vs 464
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2073 vs 845
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1151 vs 1017
- 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1853 vs 464
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2073 vs 845
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 810 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 96 vs 12 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 225 vs 155 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2473 vs 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1151 vs 1017 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1853 vs 464 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2073 vs 845 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1151 vs 1017 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1853 vs 464 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2073 vs 845 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 610
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 610 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 693 | 681 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 155 | 225 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2443 | 2473 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1017 | 1151 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 464 | 1853 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 845 | 2073 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1017 | 1151 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 464 | 1853 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 845 | 2073 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 170 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.498 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 140.06 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.502 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.613 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.49 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 610 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Fermi |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT1 | GF108 |
Launch date | 30 August 2016 | 15 May 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1531 | 1440 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $99.99 | |
Price now | $99.21 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.89 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 810 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 422.4 gflops | 311.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 12 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 26.4 GTexel / s | 12.96 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt | 65 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 585 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |