Intel HD Graphics 615 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 710

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 615 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 615

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 65% higher texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 15.26 GTexel / s
• Around 10% better floating-point performance: 403.2 gflops vs 366.3 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 19 Watt
• 8x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 709 vs 628
• Around 56% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3037 vs 1948
• Around 86% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.486 vs 6.705
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 215.572 vs 100.391
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.238 vs 0.441
• Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 11.311 vs 8.146
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1128 vs 977
• Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2409 vs 1833
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1128 vs 977
• Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2409 vs 1833

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710

• 3.2x more core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 8x more pipelines: 192 vs 24
• Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 211 vs 186
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 20.64 vs 18.292
• Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1494 vs 1128
• Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1494 vs 1128

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 615
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	709 628
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	186 211
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3037 1948
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.486 6.705
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	215.572 100.391
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.238 0.441
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11.311 8.146
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18.292 20.64
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1128 977
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1128 1494
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2409 1833
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1128 977
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1128 1494
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2409 1833

Compare specifications (specs)