Intel HD Graphics 615 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 615 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 615
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 65% higher texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 15.26 GTexel / s
- Around 10% better floating-point performance: 403.2 gflops vs 366.3 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 19 Watt
- 8x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 709 vs 628
- Around 56% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3042 vs 1947
- Around 86% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.486 vs 6.705
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 215.572 vs 100.391
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.238 vs 0.441
- Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 11.311 vs 8.146
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1128 vs 977
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2409 vs 1833
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1128 vs 977
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2409 vs 1833
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 August 2016 vs 27 March 2014 |
Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s vs 15.26 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 403.2 gflops vs 366.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt vs 19 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 709 vs 628 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3042 vs 1947 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.486 vs 6.705 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 215.572 vs 100.391 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.238 vs 0.441 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.311 vs 8.146 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1128 vs 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2409 vs 1833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1128 vs 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2409 vs 1833 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
- 3.2x more core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 8x more pipelines: 192 vs 24
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 211 vs 186
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 20.64 vs 18.292
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1494 vs 1128
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1494 vs 1128
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 192 vs 24 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 211 vs 186 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.64 vs 18.292 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1494 vs 1128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1494 vs 1128 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 615
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 615 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 709 | 628 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 186 | 211 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3042 | 1947 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.486 | 6.705 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 215.572 | 100.391 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.238 | 0.441 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.311 | 8.146 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 18.292 | 20.64 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1128 | 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1128 | 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2409 | 1833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1128 | 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1128 | 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2409 | 1833 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 192 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 615 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Kepler 2.0 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT2 | GK208B |
Launch date | 30 August 2016 | 27 March 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1485 | 1488 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $34.99 | |
Price now | $34.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 23.15 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 954 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 403.2 gflops | 366.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 192 |
Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s | 15.26 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt | 19 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 292 million |
CUDA cores | 192 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x8 |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Height | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 1.8 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
PhysX | ||
PureVideo |