Intel HD Graphics 615 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 615 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 615

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 10x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 50 Watt
• 16x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.486 vs 10.243
• Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.238 vs 0.966
• 22.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1128 vs 51
• 24x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1128 vs 47
• 40.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2409 vs 59.6

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

• 3.6x more core clock speed: 1085 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 38% higher texture fill rate: 34.72 GTexel / s vs 25.2 GTexel / s
• 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
• 2.1x better floating-point performance: 833.3 gflops vs 403.2 gflops
• Around 83% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 393.811 vs 215.572
• Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 18.793 vs 11.311
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 19.139 vs 18.292
• 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3011 vs 1128
• 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2916 vs 1128
• Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3335 vs 2409

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 615
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.486 10.243
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	215.572 393.811
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.238 0.966
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11.311 18.793
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18.292 19.139
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1128 3011
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1128 2916
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2409 3335
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1128 51
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1128 47
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2409 59.6

Compare specifications (specs)