Intel HD Graphics 630 vs Intel HD Graphics 2500
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 630 and Intel HD Graphics 2500 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 630
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 24x more texture fill rate: 27.6 GTexel / s vs 1.15 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 24 vs 6
- 32x better floating-point performance: 441.6 gflops vs 13.8 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 22 nm
- 18.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4554 vs 249
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 30 August 2016 vs 1 April 2012 |
| Texture fill rate | 27.6 GTexel / s vs 1.15 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 24 vs 6 |
| Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops vs 13.8 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 22 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4554 vs 249 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 2500
- Around 86% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 350 MHz
| Core clock speed | 650 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 630
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 2500
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 630 | Intel HD Graphics 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1114 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 268 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4554 | 249 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.948 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 312.246 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.795 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.404 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 32.567 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1859 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1945 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1859 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1945 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 388 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics 630 | Intel HD Graphics 2500 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Generation 7.0 |
| Code name | Kaby Lake GT2 | Ivy Bridge GT1 |
| Launch date | 30 August 2016 | 1 April 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 1216 | 1710 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | 13.8 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 6 |
| Texture fill rate | 27.6 GTexel / s | 1.15 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 392 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11.1 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.0 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | |
| Shared memory | 1 | 1 |


