Intel HD Graphics 630 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 630

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• 7.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 116 Watt
• 64x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.948 vs 18.461
• Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.795 vs 1.125
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.404 vs 18.511
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3344 vs 3322
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3344 vs 3322
• Around 20% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 388 vs 322

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti

• 5.1x more core clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 350 MHz
• Around 4% higher texture fill rate: 28.8 billion / sec vs 27.6 GTexel / s
• 8x more pipelines: 192 vs 24
• Around 57% better floating-point performance: 691.2 gflops vs 441.6 gflops
• Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1557 vs 1114
• Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 382 vs 268
• Around 26% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5750 vs 4554
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 354.392 vs 312.246
• Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 41.941 vs 32.567
• Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2488 vs 1859
• Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3351 vs 1945
• Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2488 vs 1859
• Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3351 vs 1945

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1114 1557
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	268 382
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4554 5750
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.948 18.461
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	312.246 354.392
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.795 1.125
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.404 18.511
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	32.567 41.941
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1859 2488
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1945 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 3322
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1859 2488
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1945 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 3322
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	388 322

Compare specifications (specs)