Intel HD Graphics P3000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 600
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics P3000 and NVIDIA Quadro 600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics P3000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 33% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 640 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 40 nm
Launch date | 1 February 2011 vs 13 December 2010 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 640 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 40 nm |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 600
- Around 88% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 526 vs 280
- 3.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 232 vs 65
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2037 vs 1300
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2037 vs 1300
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 526 vs 280 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 232 vs 65 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2037 vs 1300 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2037 vs 1300 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics P3000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 600
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics P3000 | NVIDIA Quadro 600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 280 | 526 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 65 | 232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1300 | 2037 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1300 | 2037 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2100 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.617 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 185.752 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.526 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.023 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.137 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 899 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1255 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 899 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1255 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics P3000 | NVIDIA Quadro 600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 6.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Sandy Bridge GT2 | GF108 |
Launch date | 1 February 2011 | 13 December 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1556 | 1471 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | |
Price now | $299 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 2.80 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1350 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 640 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 40 nm |
Transistor count | 995 million | 585 million |
Floating-point performance | 245.76 gflops | |
Pipelines | 96 | |
Texture fill rate | 10.24 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 3.1 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 |