Intel HD Graphics P530 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics P530 and NVIDIA Quadro K2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics P530
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.4x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 51 Watt
- Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4503 vs 4071
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 1 March 2013 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 51 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4503 vs 4071 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2000
- 2.7x more core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
- Around 18% higher maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1740 MB
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1577 vs 1161
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 385 vs 266
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1631 vs 767
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1631 vs 767
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1974 vs 1158
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1974 vs 1158
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2446 vs 2014
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2446 vs 2014
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz vs 350 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 24 |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1740 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1577 vs 1161 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 385 vs 266 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1631 vs 767 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1631 vs 767 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1974 vs 1158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1974 vs 1158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2446 vs 2014 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2446 vs 2014 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics P530
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics P530 | NVIDIA Quadro K2000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1161 | 1577 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 266 | 385 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4503 | 4071 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 767 | 1631 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 767 | 1631 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1158 | 1974 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1158 | 1974 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2014 | 2446 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2014 | 2446 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.332 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 265.424 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.093 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.009 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 38.219 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics P530 | NVIDIA Quadro K2000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Skylake GT2 | GK107 |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 1 March 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1216 | 1219 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
| Price now | $164.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 11.74 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 954 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 384 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 51 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,270 million |
| Floating-point performance | 732.7 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 30.53 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 202 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1740 MB | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel HD Graphics P530 with others
IntelHD Graphics P530 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K2000
IntelHD Graphics P530 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 830M
IntelHD Graphics P530 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 930M
IntelHD Graphics P530 vs
AMDRadeon R8 M350DX
IntelHD Graphics P530 vs
AMDRadeon R5 430 OEM
IntelHD Graphics P530 vs
AMDRadeon E9171 MCM
