Intel HD Graphics P630 vs NVIDIA GeForce 845M
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics P630 and NVIDIA GeForce 845M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics P630
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 33 Watt
- Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 294 vs 213
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 August 2016 vs 26 August 2015 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 33 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 294 vs 213 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 845M
- 3.6x more core clock speed: 1071 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1176 MHz vs 1150 MHz
- 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
- Around 18% higher maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1740 MB
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1524 vs 1199
- Around 25% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6112 vs 4880
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2320 vs 979
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2320 vs 979
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3287 vs 2158
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3287 vs 2158
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3049
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3049
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1071 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1176 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 24 |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1740 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1524 vs 1199 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6112 vs 4880 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2320 vs 979 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2320 vs 979 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3287 vs 2158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3287 vs 2158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3049 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3049 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics P630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 845M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics P630 | NVIDIA GeForce 845M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1199 | 1524 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 294 | 213 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4880 | 6112 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 979 | 2320 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 979 | 2320 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2158 | 3287 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2158 | 3287 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3049 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3049 | 3358 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.295 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 22.387 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 76.073 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics P630 | NVIDIA GeForce 845M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Kaby Lake GT2 | GM108 |
| Launch date | 5 August 2016 | 26 August 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 1027 | 1029 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | 1176 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1071 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 384 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 33 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,870 million |
| Floating-point performance | 883.7 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 27.62 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1740 MB | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | DDR3 / GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
| Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel HD Graphics P630 with others
IntelHD Graphics P630 vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 MX 420
IntelHD Graphics P630 vs
ATIFireGL X1-256
IntelHD Graphics P630 vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5600
IntelHD Graphics P630 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M370X Mac Edition
IntelHD Graphics P630 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 845M
IntelHD Graphics P630 vs
AMDRadeon R5 435 OEM
