Intel HD Graphics vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 55 nm
- 18x lower typical power consumption: 6 Watt vs 108 Watt
- 3.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 193 vs 49
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 January 2015 vs 30 March 2009 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt vs 108 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 193 vs 49 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
- 2x more core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 29.5x more texture fill rate: 38.4 GTexel / s vs 1.3 GTexel / s
- 32x more pipelines: 192 vs 6
- 29.6x better floating-point performance: 462.3 gflops vs 15.6 gflops
- Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 825 vs 463
- 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13337 vs 5315
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 38.4 GTexel / s vs 1.3 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 192 vs 6 |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops vs 15.6 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 825 vs 463 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13337 vs 5315 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 463 | 825 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 193 | 49 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5315 | 13337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 470 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3258 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3258 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Broadwell GT1 | GT200B |
Launch date | 5 January 2015 | 30 March 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1367 | 1364 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | |
Price now | $109.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 9.89 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 850 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 600 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 15.6 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 6 | 192 |
Texture fill rate | 1.3 GTexel / s | 38.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt | 108 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,300 million | 1,400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 198 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz |