Intel Arc A310 vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000
Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A310 and NVIDIA Quadro P6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A310
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 33% higher core clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1506 MHz
- Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1645 MHz
- 162.1x more texture fill rate: 64.00 GTexel/s vs 394.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 16 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
| Launch date | 2022 vs 1 October 2016 |
| Core clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1506 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1645 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 64.00 GTexel/s vs 394.8 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P6000
- 5x more pipelines: 3840 vs 768
- 6x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 4 GB
- 4.7x more memory clock speed: 9016 MHz vs 1937 MHz, 15.5 Gbps effective
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 64226 vs 30231
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 711 vs 647
- 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15308 vs 5502
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 3840 vs 768 |
| Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 9016 MHz vs 1937 MHz, 15.5 Gbps effective |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 64226 vs 30231 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 711 vs 647 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15308 vs 5502 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Arc A310
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P6000
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | Intel Arc A310 | NVIDIA Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 30231 | 64226 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 647 | 711 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5502 | 15308 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 194.277 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1916.09 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.951 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.471 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 545.751 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20035 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20035 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8770 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Arc A310 | NVIDIA Quadro P6000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Pascal |
| Code name | DG2-128 | GP102 |
| Launch date | 2022 | 1 October 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 222 | 226 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $5,999 | |
| Price now | $4,403.52 | |
| Type | Workstation | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 3.90 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1645 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1506 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 768.0 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.144 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.072 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 768 | 3840 |
| Pixel fill rate | 32.00 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 64.00 GTexel/s | 394.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 7200 million | 11,800 million |
| Floating-point performance | 12,634 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort, DVI-D DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo |
| Multi-display synchronization | Quadro Sync II | |
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Single-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1 x 8-pin |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| SLI options | 1 | |
| Width | 2" (5.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 5.1 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 124.0 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1937 MHz, 15.5 Gbps effective | 9016 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | 384 Bit |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| ECC (Error Correcting Code) | ||
| High-Performance Video I/O6 | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Desktop Management | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Arc A310 with others
IntelArc A310 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6550A
IntelArc A310 vs
NVIDIATITAN Xp
IntelArc A310 vs
NVIDIATesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
IntelArc A310 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 56
IntelArc A310 vs
AMDRadeon VII
IntelArc A310 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5600M
