Intel Arc A350 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Ti
Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A350 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A350
- 64.4x more texture fill rate: 96.00 GTexel/s vs 1,491 GTexel/s
- 32x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 800 Watt
- Around 29% higher memory clock speed: 1937 MHz, 15.5 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz, 24 Gbps effective
| Texture fill rate | 96.00 GTexel/s vs 1,491 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 800 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1937 MHz, 15.5 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz, 24 Gbps effective |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Ti
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 2355 MHz vs 2000 MHz
- Around 31% higher boost clock speed: 2625 MHz vs 2000 MHz
- 23.7x more pipelines: 18176 vs 768
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 6 nm
- 12x more maximum memory size: 48 GB vs 4 GB
| Core clock speed | 2355 MHz vs 2000 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2625 MHz vs 2000 MHz |
| Pipelines | 18176 vs 768 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 6 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 48 GB vs 4 GB |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Arc A350 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Ada Lovelace |
| Code name | DG2-128 | AD102 |
| Launch date | 2022 | 2023 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | not rated |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2000 MHz | 2625 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 2000 MHz | 2355 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 768.0 GFLOPS (1:4) | 1,491 GFLOPS (1:64) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.144 TFLOPS (2:1) | 95.42 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.072 TFLOPS | 95.42 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 768 | 18176 |
| Pixel fill rate | 48.00 GPixel/s | 504.0 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 96.00 GTexel/s | 1,491 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 800 Watt |
| Transistor count | 7200 million | 76300 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Single-slot | Triple-slot |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 200 Watt | 1200 Watt |
| Height | 61 mm, 2.4 inches | |
| Length | 336 mm, 13.2 inches | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 16-pin | |
| Width | 140 mm, 5.5 inches | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 48 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 124.0 GB/s | 1,152 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 384 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1937 MHz, 15.5 Gbps effective | 1500 MHz, 24 Gbps effective |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |