Intel Arc A350M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500M G
Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A350M and NVIDIA GeForce 9500M G videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A350M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 13 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 26400x more texture fill rate: 105.6 GTexel/s vs 4 GTexel / s
- 48x more pipelines: 768 vs 16
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 65 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 9% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1600 MHz
Launch date | 30 Mar 2022 vs 3 June 2008 |
Core clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 105.6 GTexel/s vs 4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 16 |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1600 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9500M G
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 25 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 25 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Arc A350M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9500M G
Name | Intel Arc A350M | NVIDIA GeForce 9500M G |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 23529 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 122 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 172 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Arc A350M | NVIDIA GeForce 9500M G | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Tesla |
Code name | DG2-128 | G96 |
Launch date | 30 Mar 2022 | 3 June 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 985 | 982 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2200 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1150 MHz | 500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 65 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 844.8 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.758 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.379 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 768 | 16 |
Pixel fill rate | 52.80 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 105.6 GTexel/s | 4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 20 Watt |
Transistor count | 7200 million | 314 million |
CUDA cores | 16 | |
Floating-point performance | 40 gflops | |
Gigaflops | 60 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 10.0 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR2, GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
PCI-E 2.0 |