Intel Arc A370M vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A370M and Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A370M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 5.2x more core clock speed: 1550 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 86% higher boost clock speed: 2050 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- Around 24% higher texture fill rate: 131.2 GTexel/s vs 105.6 GTexel/s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 768
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 10 nm
- 24.2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3443 vs 142
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 Mar 2022 vs 2 Sep 2020 |
Core clock speed | 1550 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2050 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 131.2 GTexel/s vs 105.6 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 768 |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 10 nm |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3443 vs 142 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Arc A370M
GPU 2: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | Intel Arc A370M | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 167.171 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1470.844 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.937 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 71.258 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 482.549 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 724 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5115 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 29747 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3443 | 142 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Arc A370M | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Generation 12.0 |
Code name | DG2-128 | Tiger Lake GT2 |
Launch date | 30 Mar 2022 | 2 Sep 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 333 | 1698 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2050 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1550 MHz | 300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 10 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1,050 GFLOPS (1:4) | 422.4 GFLOPS |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.397 TFLOPS (2:1) | 3.379 TFLOPS |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.198 TFLOPS | 1.690 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 1024 | 768 |
Pixel fill rate | 65.60 GPixel/s | 26.40 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 131.2 GTexel/s | 105.6 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 7200 million | |
Compute units | 96 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | |
Memory type | GDDR6 |