Intel Arc A380 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A380 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A380
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 2x more core clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 980 MHz
- Around 98% higher boost clock speed: 2050 MHz vs 1033 MHz
- 1673.5x more texture fill rate: 131.2 GTexel/s vs 78.4 billion / sec
- Around 7% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 960
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 87% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 140 Watt
- 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
- 322.8x more memory clock speed: 1937 MHz, 15.5 Gbps effective vs 6.0 GB/s
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 606 vs 487
- Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6242 vs 4017
- 3.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 38292 vs 11364
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 14 Jun 2022 vs 6 September 2012 |
Core clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 980 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2050 MHz vs 1033 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 131.2 GTexel/s vs 78.4 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 960 |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 140 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1937 MHz, 15.5 Gbps effective vs 6.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 606 vs 487 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6242 vs 4017 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38292 vs 11364 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
- Around 62% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1307 vs 808
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1307 vs 808 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Arc A380
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | Intel Arc A380 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 606 | 487 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6242 | 4017 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 808 | 1307 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38292 | 11364 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.505 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 705.293 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.085 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.416 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 62.69 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3581 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3365 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3581 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3365 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Arc A380 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Kepler |
Code name | DG2-128 | GK106 |
Launch date | 14 Jun 2022 | 6 September 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 313 | 740 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | |
Price now | $349.99 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 14.35 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2050 MHz | 1033 MHz |
Core clock speed | 2000 MHz | 980 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.397 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.198 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1024 | 960 |
Pixel fill rate | 65.60 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 131.2 GTexel/s | 78.4 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 140 Watt |
Transistor count | 7200 million | 2,540 million |
CUDA cores | 960 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,981 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Height | 42 mm, 1.7 inches | 4.376" (11.1 cm) |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 222 mm, 8.7 inches | 9.5" (24.1 cm) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | One 6-pin |
Width | 114 mm, 4.5 inches | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 186.0 GB/s | 144.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 96 bit | 192-bit GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 1937 MHz, 15.5 Gbps effective | 6.0 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |