Intel Arc A380 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A380 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A380
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 2.7x more core clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 98% higher boost clock speed: 2050 MHz vs 1035 MHz
- Around 58% higher texture fill rate: 131.2 GTexel/s vs 82.80 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 29% higher memory clock speed: 1937 MHz, 15.5 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 610 vs 498
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 14 Jun 2022 vs 11 May 2021 |
Core clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 735 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2050 MHz vs 1035 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 131.2 GTexel/s vs 82.80 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 8 nm |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1937 MHz, 15.5 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 610 vs 498 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
- 2.5x more pipelines: 2560 vs 1024
- Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10139 vs 6212
- Around 31% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5425 vs 4138
- Around 52% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57739 vs 38105
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 1024 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10139 vs 6212 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5425 vs 4138 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57739 vs 38105 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Arc A380
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | Intel Arc A380 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 610 | 498 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6212 | 10139 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4138 | 5425 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38105 | 57739 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 229.393 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2082.931 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.561 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 134.68 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 599.217 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16098 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16098 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Arc A380 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Ampere |
Code name | DG2-128 | GA106 |
Launch date | 14 Jun 2022 | 11 May 2021 |
Place in performance rating | 263 | 264 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2050 MHz | 1035 MHz |
Core clock speed | 2000 MHz | 735 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.397 TFLOPS (2:1) | 5.299 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.198 TFLOPS | 5.299 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 1024 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 65.60 GPixel/s | 49.68 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 131.2 GTexel/s | 82.80 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 7200 million | 12000 million |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 82.80 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 | Portable Device Dependent |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | IGP |
Height | 42 mm, 1.7 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 222 mm, 8.7 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Width | 114 mm, 4.5 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 186.0 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 96 bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1937 MHz, 15.5 Gbps effective | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |