Intel Arc A550M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A550M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A550M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 12 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 837 MHz
- 2.3x more boost clock speed: 2050 MHz vs 876 MHz
- 1399.5x more texture fill rate: 262.4 GTexel/s vs 187.5 billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 28 nm
- 4.2x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- 291.7x more memory clock speed: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 6.0 GB/s
- 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 50270 vs 24530
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2022 vs 19 February 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 837 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2050 MHz vs 876 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 262.4 GTexel/s vs 187.5 billion / sec |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 6.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 50270 vs 24530 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
- Around 31% higher pipelines: 2688 vs 2048
| Pipelines | 2688 vs 2048 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Arc A550M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | Intel Arc A550M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 50270 | 24530 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8194 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 649 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 62.027 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1218.137 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.835 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.842 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 215.546 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10176 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10176 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2901 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Arc A550M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Kepler |
| Code name | DG2-512 | GK110 |
| Launch date | 2022 | 19 February 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 424 | 422 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
| Price now | $2,054.59 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 5.09 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2050 MHz | 876 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 837 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.79 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.397 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 2688 |
| Pixel fill rate | 131.2 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 262.4 GTexel/s | 187.5 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 21700 million | 7,080 million |
| CUDA cores | 2688 | |
| Floating-point performance | 4,709 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | One 8-pin and one 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 288.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 384-bit GDDR5 |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 6.0 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||

