Intel Arc A730M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A730M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A730M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 49% higher boost clock speed: 2050 MHz vs 1379 MHz
- 2230x more texture fill rate: 393.6 GTexel/s vs 176.5 GTexel / s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2048
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 115 Watt
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 71% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 70573 vs 41233
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 565 vs 425
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2022 vs 27 June 2017 |
Boost clock speed | 2050 MHz vs 1379 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 393.6 GTexel/s vs 176.5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3072 vs 2048 |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 115 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 70573 vs 41233 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 565 vs 425 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- 4.6x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9873 vs 9808
- 2.8x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4887 vs 1732
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1215 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9873 vs 9808 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4887 vs 1732 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Arc A730M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | Intel Arc A730M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 70573 | 41233 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 565 | 425 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9808 | 9873 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1732 | 4887 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 214.123 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2293.496 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.704 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 139.717 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 692.9 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14915 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8902 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8048 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14915 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8902 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8048 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Arc A730M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Pascal |
Code name | DG2-512 | GP104 |
Launch date | 2022 | 27 June 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 219 | 221 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2050 MHz | 1379 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1215 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 25.19 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 12.60 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3072 | 2048 |
Pixel fill rate | 196.8 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 393.6 GTexel/s | 176.5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 115 Watt |
Transistor count | 21700 million | 7,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 5,648 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 336.0 GB/s | 256.3 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 8008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |