Intel Arc A750 vs Intel UHD Graphics 770
Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A750 and Intel UHD Graphics 770 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A750
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- 6.8x more core clock speed: 2050 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 66% higher boost clock speed: 2400 MHz vs 1450 MHz
- 23.2x more texture fill rate: 537.6 GTexel/s vs 23.20 GTexel/s
- 14x more pipelines: 3584 vs 256
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 10 nm
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 720 vs 532
- 6.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12373 vs 1908
- 36.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2612 vs 72
- 12.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 98254 vs 7628
- 11.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 528.023 vs 46.442
- 6.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6333.285 vs 1011.7
- 13.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 37.29 vs 2.846
- 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 140.823 vs 40.941
- 20.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1972.437 vs 94.384
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 Oct 2022 vs 4 Nov 2021 |
Core clock speed | 2050 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2400 MHz vs 1450 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 537.6 GTexel/s vs 23.20 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 256 |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 10 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 720 vs 532 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12373 vs 1908 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2612 vs 72 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 98254 vs 7628 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 528.023 vs 46.442 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6333.285 vs 1011.7 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 37.29 vs 2.846 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 140.823 vs 40.941 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1972.437 vs 94.384 |
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 770
- 15x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 225 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Arc A750
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 770
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | Intel Arc A750 | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 720 | 532 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12373 | 1908 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2612 | 72 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 98254 | 7628 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 528.023 | 46.442 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6333.285 | 1011.7 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 37.29 | 2.846 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 140.823 | 40.941 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1972.437 | 94.384 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Arc A750 | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Generation 12.2 |
Code name | DG2-512 | Alder Lake GT1 |
Launch date | 12 Oct 2022 | 4 Nov 2021 |
Place in performance rating | 78 | 832 |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2400 MHz | 1450 MHz |
Core clock speed | 2050 MHz | 300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 10 nm |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 34.41 TFLOPS (2:1) | 1485 GFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 17.20 TFLOPS | 742.4 GFLOPS |
Pipelines | 3584 | 256 |
Pixel fill rate | 268.8 GPixel/s | 11.60 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 537.6 GTexel/s | 23.20 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 21700 million | |
Compute units | 32 | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 185.6 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | |
Memory type | GDDR6 |