Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super

Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A770 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A770

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 31% higher core clock speed: 2100 MHz vs 1605 MHz
• Around 36% higher boost clock speed: 2400 MHz vs 1770 MHz
• Around 60% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 2560
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 12 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
• 424.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2969 vs 7
• Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 108639 vs 98281
• Around 88% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 552.246 vs 293.508
• Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4822.738 vs 4045.784
• Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 36.277 vs 29.145
• Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1958.986 vs 1438.826

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super

• Around 5% lower typical power consumption: 215 Watt vs 225 Watt
• 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
• Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 879 vs 753
• Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18198 vs 13175
• 8.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 158.103 vs 19.001

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Arc A770
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super

PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	753 879
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	13175 18198
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	2969 7
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	108639 98281
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	552.246 293.508
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4822.738 4045.784
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	36.277 29.145
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.001 158.103
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1958.986 1438.826

Compare specifications (specs)