Intel Arc Pro A50 vs AMD Radeon R9 Fury
Comparative analysis of Intel Arc Pro A50 and AMD Radeon R9 Fury videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc Pro A50
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 2.4x more boost clock speed: 2350 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 671.4x more texture fill rate: 150.4 GTexel/s vs 224.0 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.7x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 275 Watt
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- 4x more memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 500 MHz
Launch date | 8 Aug 2022 vs 10 July 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 2350 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 150.4 GTexel/s vs 224.0 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 275 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 500 MHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 Fury
- 3.5x more pipelines: 3584 vs 1024
- Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 789 vs 540
- Around 83% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9556 vs 5224
- Around 61% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 53258 vs 33127
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 1024 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 789 vs 540 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9556 vs 5224 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 53258 vs 33127 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Arc Pro A50
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 Fury
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | Intel Arc Pro A50 | AMD Radeon R9 Fury |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 540 | 789 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5224 | 9556 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 33127 | 53258 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 141.671 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3600.035 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.2 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 133.144 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 791.572 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10116 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10116 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4739 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Arc Pro A50 | AMD Radeon R9 Fury | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.7 | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | DG2-128 | Fiji |
Launch date | 8 Aug 2022 | 10 July 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 263 | 266 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $549 | |
Price now | $399.99 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 35.98 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2350 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Core clock speed | 2000 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1,203 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.626 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.813 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1024 | 3584 |
Pixel fill rate | 75.20 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 150.4 GTexel/s | 224.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 275 Watt |
Transistor count | 7200 million | 8,900 million |
Compute units | 56 | |
Floating-point performance | 7,168 gflops | |
Stream Processors | 3584 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 512 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 4096 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |