Intel Arc Pro A50 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
Comparative analysis of Intel Arc Pro A50 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc Pro A50
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 2.7x more core clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 735 MHz
- 2.3x more boost clock speed: 2350 MHz vs 1035 MHz
- Around 82% higher texture fill rate: 150.4 GTexel/s vs 82.80 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 540 vs 498
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 8 Aug 2022 vs 11 May 2021 |
Core clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 735 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2350 MHz vs 1035 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 150.4 GTexel/s vs 82.80 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 8 nm |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 540 vs 498 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
- 2.5x more pipelines: 2560 vs 1024
- Around 94% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10137 vs 5224
- Around 75% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57755 vs 33073
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 1024 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10137 vs 5224 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57755 vs 33073 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Arc Pro A50
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | Intel Arc Pro A50 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 540 | 498 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5224 | 10137 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 33073 | 57755 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 229.393 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2082.931 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.561 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 134.68 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 599.217 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16098 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16098 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5425 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Arc Pro A50 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Ampere |
Code name | DG2-128 | GA106 |
Launch date | 8 Aug 2022 | 11 May 2021 |
Place in performance rating | 261 | 264 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2350 MHz | 1035 MHz |
Core clock speed | 2000 MHz | 735 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1,203 GFLOPS (1:4) | 82.80 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.626 TFLOPS (2:1) | 5.299 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.813 TFLOPS | 5.299 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 1024 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 75.20 GPixel/s | 49.68 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 150.4 GTexel/s | 82.80 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 7200 million | 12000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 | Portable Device Dependent |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Form factor | IGP | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |