Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake) vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake) and NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 6153.8x more texture fill rate: 48.00 GTexel/s vs 7.8 billion / sec
- 6.7x more pipelines: 640 vs 96
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 40 nm
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 vs 15 January 2011 |
Texture fill rate | 48.00 GTexel/s vs 7.8 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 640 vs 96 |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 40 nm |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M
- 4.3x more core clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 29% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 45 Watt
Core clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M
Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake) | NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1150 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 536 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 176 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2012 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.25 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 929 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1210 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1524 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 929 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1210 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1524 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake) | NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.2 | Fermi |
Code name | Alder Lake GT1 | GF106 |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 | 15 January 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1108 | 1441 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 96 |
Pixel fill rate | 24.00 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 48.00 GTexel/s | 7.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 35 Watt |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Floating-point performance | 249.6 gflops | |
Transistor count | 1,170 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | Ring Bus | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 API with Feature Level 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | System Dependent | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | System Shared | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | System Shared | 800 MHz |
Memory type | System Shared | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |