Intel Iris Graphics 550 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Graphics 550 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Graphics 550
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1432 vs 636
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 305 vs 128
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3157 vs 2172
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3157 vs 2172
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 1 February 2010 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1432 vs 636 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 305 vs 128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3157 vs 2172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3157 vs 2172 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M
- 5x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 2.7x more pipelines: 128 vs 48
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 128 vs 48 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Graphics 550
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Graphics 550 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1432 | 636 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 305 | 128 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7182 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2675 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2675 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1290 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1290 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3157 | 2172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3157 | 2172 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Graphics 550 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Tesla |
Code name | Skylake GT3e | G92 |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 1 February 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 953 | 1294 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 128 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 754 million |
CUDA cores | 128 | |
Floating-point performance | 384.0 gflops | |
Gigaflops | 576 | |
Texture fill rate | 38 billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | Single Link DVIVGALVDSHDMIDual Link DVIDisplayPort |
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | eDRAM | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 61 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
Power management | 8.0 |