Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs AMD Radeon HD 7750

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 and AMD Radeon HD 7750 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 38% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 800 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
• 32x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 36.485 vs 21.658
• 7.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2306 vs 305
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1514 vs 1439
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3333 vs 3295
• 7.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2306 vs 305
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1514 vs 1439
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3333 vs 3295

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7750

• 10.7x more pipelines: 512 vs 48
• Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1691 vs 1364
• Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 426 vs 339
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 566.052 vs 246.614
• Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.182 vs 1.888
• Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.143 vs 21.014
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 98.126 vs 42.981

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7750

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1364 1691
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	339 426
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	36.485 21.658
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	246.614 566.052
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.888 2.182
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21.014 37.143
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	42.981 98.126
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2306 305
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1514 1439
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3333 3295
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2306 305
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1514 1439
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3333 3295

Compare specifications (specs)