Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs AMD Radeon R7 M265DX
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 and AMD Radeon R7 M265DX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 29% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 855 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1364 vs 499
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 339 vs 138
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 January 2017 vs 7 January 2014 |
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 855 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1364 vs 499 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 339 vs 138 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M265DX
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 780 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15678 vs 6590
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 780 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15678 vs 6590 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M265DX
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 | AMD Radeon R7 M265DX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1364 | 499 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 339 | 138 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6590 | 15678 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.485 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 246.614 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.888 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.014 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.981 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2306 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1514 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2306 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1514 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 720 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 | AMD Radeon R7 M265DX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | Jet |
Launch date | 3 January 2017 | 7 January 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1144 | 1146 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 855 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 780 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,040 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | IGP |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |